<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>QuantPapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.quantpapers.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.quantpapers.com</link>
	<description>Bring you the best Quant papers from around the net.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Website</title>
		<link>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=116</link>
		<comments>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=116#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey,
I started this website to post a couple of quant finance papers that I enjoyed reading, if anyone else is interested in subcribing please email me.
GregGurevich :at gmail.com
Best,
Greg Gurevich
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>I started this website to post a couple of quant finance papers that I enjoyed reading, if anyone else is interested in subcribing please email me.</p>
<p>GregGurevich :at gmail.com</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Greg Gurevich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quantpapers.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=116</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Financial Meltdown</title>
		<link>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=112</link>
		<comments>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=112#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Bernanke]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice little article by Philip Protter on the financial meltdown.
Direct Link
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice little article by Philip Protter on the financial meltdown.</p>
<p><a href="http://nuclearphynance.com/User%20Files/99/The%20Financial%20Meltdown6.pdf">Direct Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quantpapers.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=112</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Tail of Two Worlds</title>
		<link>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=106</link>
		<comments>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=106#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 21:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Article]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Behavioral Finance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little article about fat tails.
Direct Link
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little article about fat tails.</p>
<p><a href="http://trendfollowing.com/whitepaper/mauboussin.pdf">Direct Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quantpapers.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=106</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cross-section Regression with common shocks</title>
		<link>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=103</link>
		<comments>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=103#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been years since I looked at this paper, great stuff.
Direct Link 
Alternative (slow)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been years since I looked at this paper, great stuff.</p>
<p><a href="http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/pub/faculty/ferrall/quant/papers/03_10_02_andrews.pdf">Direct Link </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.quantpapers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/03_10_02_andrews.pdf">Alternative </a>(slow)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quantpapers.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=103</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too big to fail?</title>
		<link>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=95</link>
		<comments>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=95#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 19:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Misc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 1999 Article about the collapse of LTCM. Basically bedtime reading.
In September 1998 the Federal Reserve organized a rescue of Long-Term Capital Management, a very large and prominent hedge fund on the brink of failure. The Fed intervened because it was concerned about possible dire consequences for world financial markets if it allowed the hedge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A 1999 Article about the collapse of LTCM. Basically bedtime reading.</p>
<p>In September 1998 the Federal Reserve organized a rescue of Long-Term Capital Management, a very large and prominent hedge fund on the brink of failure. The Fed intervened because it was concerned about possible dire consequences for world financial markets if it allowed the hedge fund to fail. The Fed’s intervention was misguided and unnecessary because LTCM would not have failed anyway, and the Fed’s concerns about the effects of LTCM’s failure on financial markets were exaggerated. In the short run the intervention helped the shareholders and managers of LTCM to get a better deal for themselves than they would otherwise have obtained. The intervention also is having more serious long-term consequences: it encourages more calls for the regulation of hedge-fund activity, which may drive such activity further offshore; it implies a major open-ended extension of Federal Reserve responsibilities, without any<br />
congressional authorization; it implies a return to the discredited doctrine that the Fed should prevent the failure of large financial firms, which encourages irresponsible risk taking; and it undermines the moral authority of Fed policymakers  in their efforts to encourage their counterparts in other countries to persevere with the difficult process of economic liberalization.</p>
<p><a href="http://trendfollowing.com/whitepaper/bp52.pdf">Direct Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quantpapers.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=95</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demand Estimation With Heterogeneous Consumers and Unobserved Product Characteristics: A Hedonic Approach.</title>
		<link>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=98</link>
		<comments>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=98#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Abstract
We study the identication and estimation of Gorman-Lancaster style hedonic models of demand for dierentiated products for the case when one product characteristic is not observed. Our identication and estimation strategy is a two-step approach in the spirit of Rosen (1974). Relative to Rosen&#8217;s approach, we generalize the rst stage estimation to allow for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<p>We study the identication and estimation of Gorman-Lancaster style hedonic models of demand for dierentiated products for the case when one product characteristic is not observed. Our identication and estimation strategy is a two-step approach in the spirit of Rosen (1974). Relative to Rosen&#8217;s approach, we generalize the rst stage estimation to allow for a single dimensional unobserved product characteristic, and also allow the hedonic pricing function to have a general, non-additive structure. In the second stage, if the product space is continuous and the functional form of utility is known then there exists an inversion between the consumer&#8217;s choices and her preference parameters. This inversion can be used to recover the distribution of random coecients nonparametrically. For the more common case when the set of products is nite, we use the revealed preference conditions from the hedonic model to develop a Gibbs sampling estimator for the distribution of random coecients. We apply our methods to estimating personal computer demand.</p>
<p><a href="http://qed.econ.queensu.ca/pub/faculty/ferrall/quant/papers/03_09_16_bajari.pdf">Direct Link</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.quantpapers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/03_09_16_bajari.pdf">Alternative</a> (slow)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quantpapers.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=98</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The End by Michael Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=114</link>
		<comments>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=114#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seams almost everyone read this article on the trading floor.
Michael Lewis (writer of Liars Poker) talks about what went wrong.
The era that defined Wall Street is finally, officially over. Michael Lewis, who chronicled its excess in Liar’s Poker, returns to his old haunt to figure out what went wrong.
Link to Article
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seams almost everyone read this article on the trading floor.</p>
<p>Michael Lewis (writer of Liars Poker) talks about what went wrong.</p>
<div id="headDeck" class="dek">The era that defined Wall Street is finally, officially over. Michael Lewis, who chronicled its excess in <em>Liar’s Poker,</em> returns to his old haunt to figure out what went wrong.</div>
<p><a href="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/national-news/portfolio/2008/11/11/The-End-of-Wall-Streets-Boom?print=true">Link to Article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quantpapers.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=114</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Quantitative Approach to Tactical Asset Allocation</title>
		<link>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=92</link>
		<comments>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=92#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abstract 
The purpose of this paper is to present a simple quantitative method that improves the risk-adjusted returns across various asset classes. The approach is examined since 1972 in an allocation framework utilizing a combination of publicly traded indices including the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index (S&#038;P 500), Morgan Stanley Capital International Developed Markets Index [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abstract </p>
<p>The purpose of this paper is to present a simple quantitative method that improves the risk-adjusted returns across various asset classes. The approach is examined since 1972 in an allocation framework utilizing a combination of publicly traded indices including the Standard and Poor’s 500 Index (S&#038;P 500), Morgan Stanley Capital International Developed Markets Index (MSCI EAFE), Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI), National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts Index (NAREIT), and United States Government 10-Year Treasury Bonds. The empirical results are equity-like returns with bond-like volatility and drawdown, and over thirty consecutive years of positive returns.</p>
<p><a href='http://trendfollowing.com/whitepaper/CMT-Simple.pdf' >Direct Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quantpapers.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=92</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pricing European average rate currency options</title>
		<link>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=87</link>
		<comments>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=87#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abstract
This paper develops a simple methodology that yields closed-form analytical approximations for valuing European option claims involving the arithmetic average offuture foreign exchange rates. The main advantage of the approach is that it avoids the need to adopt time-consuming numerical procedures.
The precision of the resulting formula, and the distributional assumption that underlies it, is examined [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abstract</p>
<p>This paper develops a simple methodology that yields closed-form analytical approximations for valuing European option claims involving the arithmetic average offuture foreign exchange rates. The main advantage of the approach is that it avoids the need to adopt time-consuming numerical procedures.<br />
The precision of the resulting formula, and the distributional assumption that underlies it, is examined by way of Monte Carlo simulations. (JEL F3 1) </p>
<p><a href='http://www.quantpapers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/euro-avg-rate-fx.pdf'>euro-avg-rate-fx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quantpapers.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=87</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Brownian bridge construction in quasi-Monte Carlo methods for computational finance</title>
		<link>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=85</link>
		<comments>http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=85#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.quantpapers.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods have been playing an important role for high-dimensional problems
in computational finance. Several techniques, such as the Brownian bridge (BB) and the principal component
analysis, are often used in QMC as possible ways to improve the performance of QMC. This paper proposes
a new BB construction, which enjoys some interesting properties that appear useful [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods have been playing an important role for high-dimensional problems<br />
in computational finance. Several techniques, such as the Brownian bridge (BB) and the principal component<br />
analysis, are often used in QMC as possible ways to improve the performance of QMC. This paper proposes<br />
a new BB construction, which enjoys some interesting properties that appear useful in QMC methods. The<br />
basic idea is to choose the new step of a Brownian path in a certain criterion such that it maximizes the<br />
variance explained by the new variable while holding all previously chosen steps fixed. It turns out that<br />
using this new construction, the first few variables are more “important” (in the sense of explained variance)<br />
than those in the ordinary BB construction, while the cost of the generation is still linear in dimension.<br />
We present empirical studies of the proposed algorithm for pricing high-dimensional Asian options and<br />
American options, and demonstrate the usefulness of the new BB.</p>
<p><a href="http://Paper">LinWang.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.quantpapers.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=85</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
